www.anna-abraham.com
  • Home
  • Background
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Conversations
  • Talks
  • Expert Views
  • Blog
  • Teaching
  • Topic Alerts

Searching for the Self: Solitude versus Dialogue

1/17/2017

1 Comment

 
Artists of all stripes swear by the need for solitude. A simple internet search will churn out 100s of quotes from well-known and accomplished individuals avowing the same. So there seems to be broad consensus for this idea. Indeed, the quest for self-knowledge, self-realization and self-awareness to any end across different spiritual traditions (e.g., achieving a deep understanding one's self, realizing that the self is an illusion, etc.)  emphasizes the need for some form of effortful distancing. Distancing oneself away from the collective via solitude or silence in order to be in a position to engage in deep self-reflection or inward monitoring. 

At the same time, meaningful collaboration and connection with thought-stimulating others has also been touted as exceedingly important in the creative process. Discourse allows for the exchange of ideas. Exposure to others' ideas increases our own conceptual knowledge. With that, the chance of our arriving at unusual combinations of ideas increases. It is little wonder then that the vital role of social spaces in facilitating discourse has been strongly advocated by several experts (e.g., Steven Johnson's "Where Good Ideas Come From"). This is in fact one of the grounds that have been put forward to explain greater levels of innovation and productivity in big cities (Bettencourt et al., 2007; 2011).

I think the following quotes by Rainer Maria Rilke capture some aspects of these two sides well.
  • “The only journey is the one within.”
  • “I want to be with those who know secret things or else alone.”
  • “Make your ego porous. Will is of little importance, complaining is nothing, fame is nothing. Openness, patience, receptivity, solitude is everything."
 
Most of the discussion of what we "gain" in communication with others is on the increase of our knowledge by virtue of exposure to others' ideas (that resonate with us or fundamentally inform us in some way). We are mere RECIPIENTS in this constellation.

*********

Here is what's missing from this picture though.
What rarely, if ever, gets a mention much less a discussion is the fact that one also arrives self-knowledge as the AGENT of communication. This is exemplified in letters between artists and people close to them. Indeed, Rilke's outpourings of introspective wisdom (and inestimable generosity) were captured beautifully in his countless letters, the most well-known of which are the collection titled 'Letters to Young Poet'. Here are four further examples of powerful statements made by other profoundly reflective thinkers that speak to this idea.

1. (A quote by Michel de Montaigne)
“The most fruitful and natural exercise for our minds is, in my opinion, conversation.” 



2. (An excerpt from the 2014 Paris Review Interview of Adam Phillips by Paul Holdengraber)

PHILLIPS
"... a Welshman called Ernest Jones, had an idea that, interestingly, sort of disappeared. He believed that everybody’s deepest fear was loss of desire, what he called aphanisis. For him that’s the thing we’re most acutely anxious about, having no desire. People now might call it depression, but it wouldn’t be the right word for it, because he’s talking about a very powerful anxiety of living in a world in which there’s nothing and nobody one wants. But it can be extremely difficult to know what you want, especially if you live in a consumer, capitalist culture which is phobic of frustration—where the moment you feel a glimmer of frustration, there’s 
something available to meet it. Now, shopping and eating and sex may not be what you’re wanting, but in order to find that out you have to have a conversation with somebody. You can’t sit in a room by yourself like Rodin’s Thinker.

INTERVIEWER
Why not?

PHILLIPS
Because in your mind, you’re mad. But in conversation you have the chance of not being. Your mind by itself is full of unmediated anxieties and conflicts. In conversation things can be metabolized and digested through somebody else—I say something to you and you can give it back to me in different forms—whereas you’ll notice that your own mind is very often extremely repetitive. It is very difficult to surprise oneself in one’s own mind."



3. (An Interview with Martin Shaw, mythologist & storyteller.
Watch from the start. The moment arrives around the 1st minute.)



4. (An excerpt from Kahlil Gibran's 'Self-Knowledge')
And a man said, Speak to us of Self-Knowledge.
And he answered saying:
Your hearts know in silence the secrets of the days and the nights.
But your ears thirst for the sound of your heart’s knowledge.
You would know in words that which you have always known in thought.
You would touch with your fingers the naked body of your dreams.

And it is well you should.
The hidden well-spring of your soul must needs rise and run murmuring to the sea;
And the treasure of your infinite depths would be revealed to your eyes.
But let there be no scales to weigh your unknown treasure;
And seek not the depths of your knowledge with staff or sounding line.
For self is a sea boundless and measureless ...


1 Comment

How do we know what is real?

3/30/2016

2 Comments

 
One of the many abilities we take for granted about ourselves is our astounding capacity to immerse ourselves in fictional worlds through diverse mediums (e.g., books, films, games), and re-emerge from them back into our reality with no sense of confusion about what is real and what is not. We can be so deeply emotionally absorbed in these fictional realms so as to weep, giggle, feel fearful or be shocked while experiencing the events that come to pass in these worlds. Yet, when the experience is over, we come out of it unscathed in terms of our understanding of what is real.

How is this possible? And can neuroscience guide us in arriving at the right answers?

I contributed a book chapter to an edited volume Neuroscience in Intercultural Contexts that was published towards the end of 2015. In it, I explore factors that facilitate our understanding of the reality/fiction distinction on the basis of neuroscientific investigations of this question. I particularly focus on the dominant role played by the factor of personal significance/relevance in social contexts in bringing about this implicit knowledge.

The chapter largely derives from some of my previous work:
1. Abraham A, von Cramon DY & Schubotz RI (2008). Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (6), 965-976. 
2. Abraham A & von Cramon DY (2009) Reality = Relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain’s default network when telling apart reality from fiction. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4741: 1-9.
3. Abraham A (2013). The world according to me: Personal relevance and the medial prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 341: 1-4.

I have also explored related issues in external blogposts following the Salzburg 547 session on "The Neuroscience of Art: What are the the Sources of Creativity and Innovation?" in February 2015.
1. The Four Walls of an Empiricist
2. The Meandering Imagination

2 Comments
Forward>>
    Picture
    This is ...

    an entirely unstructured & zany exploration of all things that are or could be relevant to understanding the human imagination.

    Archives

    March 2021
    September 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    April 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

    Categories

    All
    Aesthetics
    Analogy
    Art
    Brain
    Cognition
    Concepts
    Creativity
    Education
    Episodic
    Event
    Fantasy
    Festival
    Fiction
    Flow
    Health
    Imagination
    Improvisation
    Innovation
    Insight
    Interview
    Memory
    Metaphor
    Neuropsychology
    Neuroscience
    Philosophy
    Poetry
    Psychology
    Reality
    Representations
    Rhythm
    Self
    Semantic
    Social
    Solitude
    Synchrony
    Theories
    Wellbeing

    RSS Feed